Archive | innovation RSS feed for this section

The tension of creating vs maximizing

30 Jan

I’m about half-way through “The Design of Business” by Roger Martin which explores how knowledge advances from one stage to another-from mystery (something we can’t explain) to heuristic (a rule of thumb that guides us toward solution) to algorithm (a predictable formula for producing an answer) to code (when the formula becomes so predictable it can be fully automated). As knowledge advances across the stages, productivity grows and costs drop-creating massive value for companies. p18-19

He talks about two of the models companies operate under, exploitation and exploration.  To paraphrase companies that operate under the exploitation philosophy will analyze a set of resources and their strategy will be to squeeze every drop of revenue and subsequent profit out of those resources, think of these companies as super efficient.   Companies that adhere to the strategy of exploration will purposefully step of the path of their current success to analyze the market, the customer and seek to discover new products.  Exploitation is a strategy that reaps tremendous benefit – and then seemingly overnight the cash cow runs dry.   Exploration bears almost no fruit in the short-term and can command equal resources without benefit – then seemingly overnight it turns into a rock star.

(Needless to say, because of the fiduciary responsibility most public companies adhere to exploitation vs exploration.)
While reading that, I came across this article on Slate.com profiling Jeff Bezos, Founder/CEO of Amazon and the Kindle.  Below is what he had to say about Amazon (and the creation of the Kindle).

 

“There are two ways that companies can extend what they’re doing. One is they can take an inventory of their skills and competencies, and then they can say, “OK, with this set of skills and competencies, what else can we do?” And that’s a very useful technique that all companies should use. But there’s a second method, which takes a longer-term orientation. It is to say, rather than ask what are we good at and what else can we do with that skill, you ask, who are our customers? What do they need? And then you say we’re going to give that to them regardless of whether we currently have the skills to do so, and we will learn those skills no matter how long it takes. Kindle is a great example of that. It’s been on the market for two years, but we worked on it for three years in earnest before that. We talked about it for a year before that. We had to go hire people to build a hardware- engineering team to build the device. We had to acquire new skills. There’s a tendency, I think, for executives to think that the right course of action is to stick to the knitting—stick with what you’re good at. That may be a generally good rule, but the problem is the world changes out from under you if you’re not constantly adding to your skill set.”

 

I love the convergence of learning, and here is Jeff Bezos talking about their strategy “rather than ask what are we good at and what else can we do with that skill, you ask, who are our customers? What do they need?” which is a near perfect example of an exploratory strategy.
I love it.
Enhanced by Zemanta

What if record labels acted more like VCs?

25 May

Twins, two people that have similarity.  Crazy enough, I’ve got a twin brother – and we aren’t identical twins (this is what he looks like). 
He knows a bit about music and music culture – he just finished up his Masters of Music Composition and Arranging at Belmont University in Nashville, TN. (Here’s a link to some music he wrote/arranged.  Fav 1 (start 1:54), Fav 2 We were in the car recently and he was talking about the state of the music industry, and how it’s broken for both labels and bands, and attempts at variations have been mere band-aids. He mentioned how the niche-label market is broken, but the indie label market helps musicians keep ownership but they make less money, and how the mainstream label hopes to produce a few blockbusters to float the rest of the music we really like. 

As he was saying this it struck me, if you profiled the music industry you’ve got bands/artists who are hoping to get noticed by the big labels so they’ll sign a deal and have money and connections to make an albulm that sells like crazy and installs them in the hall of music fame.

Sound familar? Taking out the music references we’ve got startup founders, trying to get noticed by venture capital firms so they can sign a deal and have capital, connections and advisors that will help them to produce a product/company that sells like crazy and ends with an IPO or acquistion.  Not to mention the comparisions between band members and early startup staff.  So we’ve got twin industries.

What is the model that music labels use currently?  I honestly don’t know – but I what if the music industry made a shift and started to approach bands/artists like VCs approach startup companies.  But why not?  I’m sure Fred Wilson (my VC pundit of choice) would happily share insights with a few select major labels.  What I’m not saying is that music labels are roadkill, I don’t believe that. But I don’t think the face melting guitar solo playing rockstar model of labels is going to last in it’s current form.  I do believe they currently use a system for finding, signing, and promoting bands that isn’t necessarily primed for ROI.  (Off topic, same with books, although I’ve been very impressed with Michael Hyatt and his changes at Thomas Nelson).

The music industry is changing, artists like NIN are using technolgy (iPhone app, sales via their website) to change what they are about for their community.  Radiohead did the pay what you want release on their site.  Were these homeruns? Not really, but they indicate change and unrest in the industry

These changes have the potential to make music better for us as listeners and also create opportunities and environments that offer better compensation and resources for artists.  This is a win-win – and if you’re like me can you imagine even better music!?

So my suggestion is that music labels take a VC approach to their market.  Music is an art, and it’s infused with passion, but I’m pretty sure I can find programmers and engineers who feel the same about what they do and labels exist for the same reason VC’s do, capital returns.

But I can imagine a world where a budding band, gets hooked up with an early-stage label, who provides some cash and some connections and eventually they are on the biggest stage they desire.   Rags to riches, but they don’t lose all their IP in the process, and the label spends small amounts of money on some bands and the ones that are profitable get additional funding.

So Sony BMG, talk to some venture guys in Nasvhille and learn about how their industry works – and begin to adapt it to yours and I’ll eagerly wait to see what happens.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Kip Knight shares how to utilize the power of all to build your business

21 Mar

I was fortunate to attend the Cincinnati area AMA lunch today, where Kip Knight, Vice President – Marketing of eBay spoke about “using the power of all of us to build your business” where he outlined his thoughts on the trending of business and marketing of companies moving into an open sourcing and collaboration model and away from the command and control model so many companies are familiar with.

Kip covered ground quickly, and interspersed his big ideas with humor to keep it light. As a result I left with a couple pages of notes. While Kip didn’t plant to many new ideas in my head, he proved a great review of blogs and articles I’ve read in the past few months. It’s also great to see yet another industry leader such as eBay to embrace these ideas.

You can view my full notes here (pdf download), but I thought I’d share a couple things he mentioned which I found very helpful and interesting.

First, Kip talked about a couple methods/programs they use to monitor the pulse of the eBay community.

* Voices – They fly in 20 users (sellers/buyers) each month and senior management with other key employees sit and talk with these users. Learning what they like about the site, what they don’t like, features they’d find helpful, etc. Once these users visit they become part of the Voices community and can be called in the future to answer questions and provide opinions on new ideas.
* Visits – This method takes 3 ebay employees to visit site users in their homes and watch them sell/buy on eBay. One employee asks questions, another takes notes, and the last video tapes.
* Views – Once a quarter, they conducts topical focus groups around the country on topics that are important to the company and it’s user base. i.e. Topic for Q2 2008 is safety

Secondly, he mentioned a couple stats I found very intriguing, the first of which is that 40% of the things sold on eBay are sold/listed via their API. 40%! That’s huge!

He also mentioned Wikipedia and how it’s huge user base allows for it to have a minimal staff of 5 full time employees, yet it is very agile in maintaining it’s product (obscenities last online for 1.7 minutes). It blows my mind that they are that quick in removing information that doesn’t conform to their community rules.

His talk sparked quite a few questions and ideas that require a bit more development, but I’ll follow up with additional posts later as those thoughts tie in for me, especially how they work with Abunga.

He also endorsed a book that I’m currently reading which is “Ultimate Question: For Unlocking the Door to Good Profits and True Growth” by Frederick F. Reichheld. The book focuses on the use of what is called the Net Promoter Score, boiling down to the question – would you recommend us to a friend? Pretty simple question, but very pertinent.

http://abunga.com/images/books/large/830/9781591397830.jpg

Have a great Easter.

Enhanced by Zemanta

sliding off track

21 Mar

forest2.jpg

The weather down here in Knoxville has been gorgeous, sunny and in the high 60s. Yesterday I took advantage of this weather and went mountain biking for the first time this year. It was a great ride, good traction, a slight breeze and they’d done some trail improvement from the fall so the loop was much faster. On one downhill switchback I went sliding off the trail into the the leafs and subsequently that led me into a tree which stopped my slide. Now sliding into that tree hurt, not only my hand (which connected solidly with the trunk) but my pride as well, I’ve been riding for a few years, I don’t think I should be sliding off the trail into trees. I got unclipped and untangled and hopped back up on the trail. Then it happened again, different curve, different tree, same pain. This time it happened I thought about it a bit more. As I rode away I realized that I was forgetting a crucial element, I wasn’t steering. As soon as I saw I was going off track I would neglect to point myself in the right direction and I would focus only on stopping. The next time I came around a switchback I made the decision to turn the direction I wanted to go, regardless of the consequence. Surprise, surprise I stayed on the trail, now it wasn’t the most controlled turn I’ve made, but it got me around the corner.

Now how often in our business or interactions do we forget to steer? We are so focused on maintaining speed, we get caught up in our daily actions and forget to steer. Creating new products or improvements of existing improvements are crucial, but sometimes the trail changes direction. We can steer better by learning from our customers, to talking with them about the product/service. If not our customers directly, then our salespeople who are the next closest. On my ride If I would have looked ahead I probably could have seen that the turn was coming and prepared for it (and not hit a tree).

Strategy is important too, we must look forward unless we want to join the likes of companies that have been industry leaders at some point, and they become so myopic and focused on what they do, they neglect to look forward until they are at the turn in the trail, and all their momentum, their investment, is propelling them off the trail into a tree.

Going off the trail into a tree hurts, the same is for business. If we’ve been in our market for a long time, like I’ve been biking for a while, we expect the similar performance. We forget that our idea’s that got us started had risk, and that the cycle of change is always happening.

To avoid trees and to make it through switchbacks I think we have to steer and look ahead. What do you think? Is one more important than the other? Or is their an “x” not considered here that trumps all others?

Enhanced by Zemanta